Use Cases
recommit is designed for teams that maintain multiple versions of their software simultaneously. Here are the most common use cases.
Who Benefits from recommit?
Open Source Library Maintainers
If you maintain a library with multiple major versions (v1, v2, v3), you know the pain of:
- Backporting bug fixes to all versions
- Ensuring security patches reach all supported releases
- Keeping documentation in sync
Enterprise Product Teams
B2B software companies often need to:
- Support multiple product versions for different customers
- Maintain LTS (Long Term Support) branches
- Deploy hotfixes across all active releases
Security Teams
When a vulnerability is discovered, you need to:
- Patch all affected versions quickly
- Ensure no supported version is left vulnerable
- Track that all branches received the fix
Common Scenarios
| Scenario | Without recommit | With recommit |
|---|---|---|
| Bug fix to 4 versions | 4 manual cherry-picks | 1 PR merge, auto-sync |
| Security patch | Tedious, error-prone | Automated, reliable |
| Feature backport | Hours of work | Minutes |
| Release management | Complex scripts | Simple configuration |
Before recommit
# The old way - for every PR merged to main
git checkout v3
git cherry-pick abc123
git push origin v3
git checkout v2
git cherry-pick abc123
# Conflict! Spend time resolving...
git push origin v2
git checkout v1
git cherry-pick abc123
git push origin v1
# Repeat for every PR, every day...After recommit
1. Merge PR to main
2. ✅ Done - recommit handles the restQuick Comparison
| Aspect | Manual | recommit |
|---|---|---|
| Time per fix | 15-30 min | 1 min |
| Error rate | High (human error) | Low (automated) |
| Tracking | Manual notes | Built-in history |
| Scale | Doesn't scale | Handles any volume |
Getting Started
Choose the guide that matches your situation:
- Library Versioning - Open source or internal libraries
- Enterprise Releases - Multi-version SaaS or on-prem products
- Security Patches - Rapid vulnerability response