Security Patch Backporting
When a security vulnerability is discovered, every minute counts. This guide shows how recommit helps you patch all versions quickly and reliably.
The Security Challenge
Security patching is uniquely challenging:
- Time pressure: Vulnerabilities need immediate fixing
- Completeness: Can't miss any supported version
- Accuracy: Mistakes can leave systems vulnerable
- Coordination: Multiple teams need to act fast
The Risk of Manual Backporting
Manual cherry-picks under pressure lead to:
- Forgotten branches
- Incorrect cherry-picks
- Merge conflicts blocking deployments
- Inconsistent patches across versions
Security Response with recommit
Streamlined Workflow
1. Vulnerability reported
│
2. Fix developed and tested on main
│
3. Security PR merged
│
4. recommit automatically creates PRs for ALL versions
│
5. Security team reviews each PR
│
6. Merge and deploy simultaneously
│
7. Disclose vulnerability (if applicable)Time Comparison
| Task | Manual | With recommit |
|---|---|---|
| Cherry-pick to 5 versions | 30-60 min | 0 min (auto) |
| Review all versions | Same | Same |
| Total patch time | 2-3 hours | 30-60 min |
Setup for Security Response
Dedicated Security Roadmap
Create a roadmap specifically for security patches:
Name: Security Backports
Branches: main; v5; v4; v3-lts; v2-lts
Cherry-pick to Default Branch: EnabledInclude ALL supported versions, even those that normally only get critical fixes.
Repository Configuration
For security-critical repositories:
- Link to security roadmap
- Enable auto cherry-pick
- Test the workflow before an incident
Security Incident Response
Step-by-Step Process
Before You Start: Follow your organization's security incident response procedures. recommit assists with code changes but doesn't replace security protocols.
Phase 1: Assess and Fix
-
Evaluate the vulnerability
- Affected versions
- Severity (CVSS score)
- Attack vector
-
Develop the fix
- Create fix on main branch
- Write tests to prevent regression
- Get security team review
-
Merge to main
- Merge the security PR
- recommit immediately starts creating backport PRs
Phase 2: Backport and Verify
-
Monitor auto-created PRs
- Check recommit dashboard
- All versions should have PRs within minutes
-
Review each backport
- Verify fix is correct for that version
- Run security tests
- Check for conflicts
-
Resolve any conflicts
- Prioritize by severity/user count
- Security team should handle conflicts
- Don't delay—every minute matters
Phase 3: Deploy and Disclose
-
Merge and deploy
- Merge all backport PRs
- Trigger deployments
- Verify patches are live
-
Post-incident
- Update security advisory
- Notify affected users
- Document lessons learned
Real-World Example
Scenario: Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
Situation: Security researcher reports auth bypass affecting all versions.
Your versions:
- main (development)
- v5 (current stable)
- v4 (previous stable)
- v3-lts (long-term support)
- v2-lts (legacy LTS, end-of-life soon)
Response Timeline:
| Time | Action |
|---|---|
| T+0 | Vulnerability reported |
| T+2h | Fix developed and tested |
| T+2h 15m | PR merged to main |
| T+2h 16m | recommit creates 4 backport PRs |
| T+2h 30m | All PRs reviewed |
| T+2h 45m | 3 PRs merged (v5, v4, v3-lts) |
| T+3h | v2-lts conflict resolved and merged |
| T+3h 15m | All versions deployed |
| T+3h 30m | Security advisory published |
Without recommit, the T+2h 15m to T+3h period would take 2+ hours longer.
Handling Security-Specific Challenges
Embargo/Coordinated Disclosure
When working under embargo:
- Create the fix PR privately
- Keep it unmerged until disclosure time
- At disclosure time:
- Merge main PR
- recommit creates backports
- Quickly merge all backports
- Publish advisory
Version-Specific Vulnerabilities
If only some versions are affected:
- Fix in the oldest affected version
- Let recommit backport forward
- Close PRs for unaffected versions
Complex Vulnerabilities
For vulnerabilities requiring different fixes per version:
- Create separate PRs for each version manually
- Or fix in main and resolve conflicts in backport PRs
Best Practices for Security
1. Test Your Workflow Before an Incident
Don't wait for a real vulnerability:
- Create a test "security fix" PR
- Verify recommit creates all backports
- Practice the review and merge process
2. Maintain Updated Branch List
Regularly update your security roadmap:
- Add new release branches
- Remove end-of-life versions
- Verify all branches exist
3. Automate Security Testing
For each backport PR:
- Run automated security scans
- Execute regression tests
- Validate the fix works on that version
4. Document Response Time
Track metrics:
- Time from report to fix merged
- Time to patch all versions
- Conflicts encountered
5. Have a Conflict Resolution Plan
Pre-assign who handles conflicts:
- Main security engineer owns resolution
- Backup person if primary unavailable
- Clear escalation path
Integration with Security Tools
Dependabot/Renovate
For dependency vulnerabilities:
- Dependabot opens PR on main
- Merge the update
- recommit backports to other versions
- Review compatibility per version
SAST/DAST Integration
Configure your security scanners to:
- Run on all backport PRs
- Block merge if issues found
- Report to security dashboard
Vulnerability Tracking
Link recommit activity to:
- CVE records
- Security advisory platforms
- Customer notification systems
Metrics and Reporting
Key Metrics to Track
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Time to patch all versions | < 4 hours |
| Versions missed | 0 |
| Conflicts requiring manual work | < 20% |
| Successful first-time cherry-picks | > 80% |
Post-Incident Review
After each security incident:
- Review recommit performance
- Identify process improvements
- Update roadmap if needed